Free Interview Resources
Free practice questions, preparation advice, and expert insights for Law interviews at Cambridge.
Real Law interview questions in the style Cambridge asks. Try answering each one aloud before you reveal the hint.
A statute defines murder as intentionally causing another person's death. Someone plants a bomb on an aeroplane to claim insurance, foreseeing that passengers will die. Should the passenger deaths count as intentional?
Evidence & Analysis
A person gives poison that has only a tiny chance of killing. The victim dies. Can the death still be said to have been intentionally caused?
Evidence & Analysis
Doctors separate conjoined twins knowing one will die but the other may live. How would you analyse intention in that case?
Evidence & Analysis
A driver says something alarming; a passenger jumps from the moving car and dies. Is the driver's statement a legal cause of death?
Evidence & Analysis
A victim refuses a life-saving blood transfusion because of a prejudice. Does that refusal break the chain between the defendant's act and the death?
Evidence & Analysis
Supervision-style interviews with problem-solving and academic discussion, often with two interviewers.
Cambridge interviews usually happen at your first-choice college. Most applicants have two interviews, with some subjects requiring a third at the pooled college. Cambridge interviews tend to involve two interviewers and may include a written assessment or pre-interview task sent on the day.
Interview Invitation
Late Nov
Arrival to Interview
Early Dec
Technical Question
Mid Dec
Decision
Early Jan
Interview Invitation
Late Nov
Arrival to Interview
Early Dec
Technical Question
Mid Dec
Decision
Early Jan
A doctor accidentally gives the wrong drug after an assault, and the patient dies. Should the original attacker still be legally responsible for the death?
A married person is asked to mortgage the family home to support a spouse's risky business. Why might the law worry about the bank's role in that transaction?
What practical reassurance should a bank seek before accepting a spouse's signature on a mortgage over the home?
Two people live on a tiny island. A gave B permission to use part of the land; generations later B's descendants have occupied it for a very long time. Who has the better claim?
If a bank can repossess your house when you default, in what sense do you own it?
Interest theory says rights protect important interests; choice theory says rights protect choices. Which theory better explains a child's rights?
Can someone who cannot exercise choice still hold a right?
Is the right not to be tortured better explained by choice, by interests, or by something else?
What makes an authority legitimate, and can you give an example of someone who has power but no legitimate authority?
Why do you want to study Law as an academic subject rather than simply because you want a legal career?
Which legal issue from your reading or current affairs has most changed your view, and what is the strongest objection to your current view?
Tell me about a book, article or case you mentioned in your personal statement; what assumption in it would you challenge?
If the state can tax property or force sale in some circumstances, does absolute ownership exist?
Could a blade of grass have a right not to be walked on?
Should it matter whether B knew the original arrangement was temporary, or honestly believed the land had become theirs?
If the bank knows one spouse has a history of pressure or abuse, should the law stop the mortgage even when the document appears validly signed?
12+ weeks
8-12 weeks
4-6 weeks
1-2 weeks
the week of
Unlock the full guide
Free Resource
The Complete Cambridge Law Interview Guide
Enter your email to unlock the full question bank, worked approaches, a week-by-week prep roadmap, and the mistakes that cost offers.
Practice with a Cambridge Law graduate who's been through it.
Book Mock Interview →Watch & Learn
Student perspectives on the Cambridge Law interview experience, useful for demystifying format and expectations.
Cambridge-specific LNAT preparation support for applicants to Law.
Useful as a springboard for selecting wider reading, though applicants should use it critically rather than copying recommendations.
Practical advice on LNAT-style reasoning and timed passage work.
All videos are the property of their respective creators.
Further Reading
by Tom Bingham
Accessible introduction to a central constitutional idea, useful for discussing law as an institution rather than just a career path.
by Catherine Barnard, Janet O'Sullivan and Graham Virgo
Cambridge-linked introductory essays that help applicants sample different areas of legal thinking.
by Helena Kennedy
Good for evaluating law in social context and for practising balanced policy arguments.
by Nicholas J. McBride
Helpful for understanding what academic legal study feels like and for clarifying motivation.
by Marcel Berlins and Clare Dyer
Useful background on how legal institutions operate, which can support discussion of access to justice and legal reform.
by University of Cambridge / FutureLearn
Free structured introduction to university-level legal study for 16-18 learners.
by University of Cambridge
Super-curricular materials suitable for developing subject curiosity beyond the school curriculum.
by Mark Elliott
Clear commentary on constitutional and public-law questions, helpful for argument practice.
by Cambridge Faculty of Law
Faculty-level explanations of legal topics that can broaden applicants' sense of Law as an academic discipline.
by HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Court observation can produce concrete reflections on legal procedure and access to justice.